Archive by Author

A Word from Our Editors – Fiction

8 May

My name is Samantha, and I’m one of the fiction readers at the Minnesota Review. I am also an undergraduate Professional Writing major here at Virginia Tech.

 

I’m going to tell you what I want to see in a submission. Since I’m only one member out of nine, please don’t feel like you have to cater to me. The truth is, I’m going to read whatever you submit, even if it’s not something I’m interested in. It all depends on how well you tell a story.

 

No matter what genre your submission is, I want the first paragraph to wow me. I want a strong first sentence. This is your work, and you need to be confident. If you present me with a submission that has a weak opening, I’m already going to be disinterested. Short stories shouldn’t take pages to get to the main storyline, and the shorter your story is, the more powerful each sentence needs to be.

 

When I finish a story, I want to still feel an attachment to it; I want to feel for the characters. A well-written work will give me reason to. Give me concrete details about the characters and their surroundings. However, I don’t want clichéd details; I want originality. Dig deeper than the obvious.

 

A sense of humor is great, but not required. I love reading stories with sarcastic or humorous undertones, but it’s very difficult to be funny on paper. 

 

I look forward to reading your submissions, and thank you to everyone who has submitted so far.

 

A Poem from Quinn White’s Chapbook, Moustache

25 Apr
WHALE RESCUES STRANDED MOTORIST
 
I won and my trophy was permission to dance
without fear. Dance in the basement where
everyone wins at pool and ping pong. Everybody
wants to kiss. Too drunk doesn’t exist. Jesus never
meant temperance. We all die after each other.
Nobody misses anybody. Every every is a me, 
but no-one minds. Because is a seashell, 
a stranger’s poem on saving whales. 
In whale salvation cases, every every is a whale, 
every whale is a motorist. In the basement, 
prayers are nil because eyes lift easy to snap
beyond the plaster. Every shoe is a bird. 
Every body, a chandelier. 
Poems are waking to a body I forgot. 

Reading “The Axiom of Choice” – Will Bebout

18 Apr

 “The Axiom of Choice” is a story that I encountered recently which I think is just fantastic. Written by David Goldman, it originally appeared in the Winter 2011 edition of The New Haven Review, but I first encountered it as episode 211 of Podcastle, a fantasy podcast that I listen to on occasion.

 

To clarify, “The Axiom of Choice” is a somewhat confusing rule that comes from math which says (as I understand it) that we are allowed to choose from the choices in a given set of numbers while trying to figure something out (as opposed to not having the logical ability to make selections at all). I think it’s pretty straightforward to just make a selection, but I suppose math requires you to spell every little thing out in black and white.

 

The story itself is simple enough, it follows a musician over the course of his life as he makes certain decisions, such as going on this trip or not, or talking to that girl or not, and then deals with the consequences of those decisions. What makes this story unique is how it is framed. “Axiom of Choice” is written in second person voice and is written like one of those old “Choose Your Own Adventure” novels (if the whole “choice” metaphor is getting a bit thick, you’ve been paying attention), where you read a section, then are presented with a choice of actions, which call on you to turn to a specific page to follow through on that action, allowing you to have many different adventures in a book.

 

Since this is a short story, not a full “Choose Your Own Adventure” book, we do not have all the pages (and all the options) a full novel might afford. “Axiom of Choice” gives you a passage, closes that passage by saying “If you wish to do this, go to page 70. If you wish to do that, go to page 94” as if we actually had those pages (which we don’t, in this 28 page story), but then the story continues on with the passage the author selected to follow through with, leaving us to wonder where the other option might have taken us. So while the story masquerades as granting free will to the reader, we really have no say in what happens, except to choose between continuing to read or putting the book down(just like with most short stories). I kept reading because the story is very playful in how it examines choice and free will and very clever in how it uses the constraints of the medium (in this case, the limited pages and space allowed for a printed or read-aloud short story) to highlight the concepts being explored in the story itself.

 

Because of its cleverness in playing within the rules of a printed short story, exploration of philosophical questions about determination and destiny, and still telling an interesting story, I award “The Axiom of Choice” a gold star, and I highly recommend that you check it out. Print or podcast, the choice is yours.

 

print version:

http://www.newhavenreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/NHR-9-Brown.pdf

podcast version:

http://podcastle.org/2012/06/05/podcastle-211-the-axiom-of-choice/

A Word From Our Editors

11 Apr

Hey. My name’s Joshua Vaught, or Johva. Some things about me:

I’ve never been to a town hall meeting, a circus, a freak show, or a soccer game. My favorite author isn’t Stephanie Meyer, J.K. Rowling, or E.L. James. I plan to avoid any and all high school reunions. If possible, I would redefine the word “doh” to mean “America the Beautiful”; also, I would create a new word, “asdf,” to mean “a word that means what it’s intended to stand for.” I sleep on a futon using a folded blanket as a pillow and pillows as a blanket. My biggest pet peeve is forgetting where I’ve placed something. I’m currently reading The Court of the Air by Stephen Hunt, which has proven difficult because I’m squeamish. My favorite “quote” is a section from Philip Larkin’s poem, “Church Going”: “Yet stop I did: in fact I often do, / And always end much at a loss like this, / Wondering what to look for.” My hobbies include writing and reading (go figure), making computer music, watching Japanese shows, and playing video games. My favorite genres are short fiction and romance. My favorite book is Moon Palace by Paul Auster.

Comments for writers of fiction:

I feel like many fiction writers picture the reader as someone sitting in a crowd of groupies. This concerns me, since I feel I have to be interested in the story’s genre and format to properly judge the piece. I shouldn’t have to feel this way, though. If the writer is doing his or her job correctly, it won’t matter if the story is about religion, Aids, rock-climbing, or what have you because I’ll want to read until the conflicts and characters are resolved. To put it directly, I want you, the writer of fiction, to show me you’re wild side, that part of you of that makes you you.

Look at it this way. I, the reader, am your lover, a close friend, a family member. I am someone that needs more than a silly pat on the back, and someone who you need to desperately open up to. I want you to speak with your voice from your unique perspective. It goes without saying that you need to adhere to the basic conventions of writing and story-telling, but your story needs to be about what you’re interested in; otherwise, the story is going to feel recycled. Recycled stories are good for making money, but aren’t truly stories in my opinion. They’re old models with new clothes—gilded clichés.

The two most important aspects of any story in my opinion are the characters and their interactions with each other. Fully realized characters and highly developed interactions can help in the development of other aspects of a story, such as setting—a room is more than a few walls and props, so long as there are characters to create meaning for them. When it comes to characters, I’m looking, for instance, for the bastard in lens-less shades willing to knock down my front door, armed to the teeth: Hello Kitty squirt-guns in western-style gun-holsters, slanted around the hips, several packets of caffeinated gum bulging from the front pockets, and an ammo belt filled to capacity with miniature Starbucks canisters. That’ll grab my attention. But then I want to know, why? I don’t mind if you make him smile or snarl or rear to hock a loogi, just so long as you make him say something afterwards to justify the intrusion. I hate it when characters don’t speak up, talk to others in the room, and make things meaningful and relatable. You can’t expect to make an impression by having him just stand there. Sure the outfit may speak for itself, but there’s nothing like a badass with a badass attitude who feels the same way as you do about, say, the irrelevancy of using doors to make you feel like a badass too. You can keep it short with just a few powerful sentences if you have to, but make sure it’s worth the cost of a replacement door. Finally, when you decide it’s time for him to leave, you should make him whistle the tune to Seibu no Kettou as he kicks his way through the debris, or do something equally as memorable, or it’s just not complete. Make his exit epic. Interesting. Worth it.

There are plenty of things that need to be considered when writing a story. Just be sure to make it your story and to make it real for your reader. If you’re going to fly around on a winged bic pen, then I need to be their riding with you. I don’t want to watch from the sidelines.

If You’re Stuck, Wait It Out – Advice from an Editor

4 Apr

As writers, we have what would appear to be a very easy job: float through life, and wait for the muse. Forget the crafting, forget the editing – the worst part of writing is just starting.

Usually my writing process follows a very similar trajectory: wait for weeks, think about needing to write something, wait another few days, lose hope and begin to think there’s nothing inspirational anywhere. Sometime after passing the last three stages though, something shifts and I open myself up to the world around me. I start observing.

Something begins then, when I really make myself available as a listener and thinker, that changes the game. I listen to people speaking and it evolves into dialogue. I look at the way someone adjusts his or her shirt or opens the door for someone else. I start thinking about how things feel. Washing your hands in the bathroom, but with cold water. You lather and rinse and dry off. Somehow they still sting after they’re dry. And then you hear someone else in the bathroom. You thought you were alone. There’s a story.

So that’s when you’re most receptive – in that waiting, feeling, listening, hearing period. That’s when your muse comes up and smacks you in the forehead.  

I can most easily describe it in the way it usually happens to me. I wait tables. It’s half soul-sucking and half gratifying, but somehow, it is great for writing. My three most recent creative endeavors have all come from things I’ve overheard, mannerisms I’ve seen, or conversations I’ve had while working.

Lately I’ve been all about the ever-talented Louise Erdrich, who I think says it the best. But what’s new. “Nothing I force myself to write about ever turns out well, and so I’ve learned to wait for the voice, the incident, the image that reverberates.”

And it’s true. If you’re stuck, wait it out. Listen to people, wait tables, use public bathrooms.

Start with something concrete, an image. Your dry, tingling hands. Now, make them do something. Write.

 

- Danielle Buynak, fiction reader

Aside

Interview with Quinn White

26 Mar

ImageThe following is an interview with Quinn White.  Her poems have appeared in or are forthcoming from journals such as Bayou Magazine, Word Riot, Weave Magazine, and Sixth Finch. Her chapbook, My Moustache, is due from Dancing Girl Press in March 2013. Sometimes she wants to dig holes.

1. Who’s the first person who encouraged you to be a writer?

My grandmother caught me singing while I was playing in the bathroom sink with mermaid ponies. She told me that my songs were quite good and suggested I write them down.  

2. What is your biggest pet peeve?

Pet peeves. For example, people say they hate “mouth-breathers.” Ridiculous. I have asthma. My nose doesn’t provide me with enough oxygen to remain conscious at all times.

3. What’s your most effective tactic for falling asleep?

Cold to warm bed. Warm to cold lights.

4. What book has given you nightmares, or otherwise appeared to you in dreams?

   The Shining. I was taking a Kubrick and Cronenberg class and King’s book was required reading. I couldn’t finish it. In fact, if I’m about to cry, one of my strategies for keeping a straight face is to imagine that woman in the bathtub. 

5. What book(s) are you reading right now?

   Essays by Emerson. Robert Hass’ What Light Can Do. ALIEN VS. PREDATOR by Michael Robbins. Woolf’s The Waves (in spurts). Williams’ play, Night of the Iguana  

6. What is the worst film adaptation of a great book that you have ever seen?

I heard the 70′s adaptation of The Great Gatsby was awful so I didn’t watch it. A friend wears a t-shirt that reads: “Movies: Ruining Books since 1910.” I think I have that date wrong. I love lots of movies adapted from films, by the way.

7. Have you ever been to a town hall meeting?

No. When I was little, however, I formed a teddy bear government. They attempted democracy.

 8. Have you ever been to a freak show?

No. Freaks, directed by Todd Browning, is a great film, though.

9. Who’s your favorite author (or book) that no one’s ever heard of?

James Herriot.

10. Who’s your favorite author that everyone’s heard of?

Charles Schulz.

11. Do you avoid high school and college reunions or do you embrace them?

I avoid gatherings of more than three people.

12. What’s your favorite single syllable word?

I love this question because it caused me to realize I am unable to separate the word from the thing it describes. I came up with “paw” and “kiss” but I don’t know if they count because what I love about them are their physical counterparts.

13. If you could make up a word, what would it be? Definitions permitted.

Mank. verb. from the French Manqué. 1.) to long for your significant other.

14. What existing word would you prefer had a different definition? State word and redefine.

Pronoun: the quality of favoring nouns over verbs.

15. What question would you like to ask of me?

 Why are people who need people the luckiest people in the world? 

A Word from One of Our Editors

26 Mar

The name is Shelby, and I’m one of the poetry readers at the minnesota review submissions. I’m also an English graduate student here at Virginia Tech in the M.A. program. In previous experience I was the poetry editor for Silhouette, the literary and arts magazine ran by undergraduates at Tech.

It’s kind of hard to nail down what exactly I look for when reading for publications, other than to say: good poems. When reading through numerous poems at one time, I have found that the best thing to do is to trust my instincts. I have to trust that I know what a good poem feels like when I’m reading it. After narrowing down the selections to my “instinct poems,” I then can take the time to see what exactly is making the piece work for me. I then I have to make the hard distinction between a poem that works just for me, and those that are going to speak to a wider audience. Trying to find your own biases in poetry is not an easy thing.

One example of the things that I find myself drawn to are poems with strong images. This obviously is extremely vague, and each artist can take so much out of it. I like to be intrigued by new combinations, by daring combinations. Or perhaps a writer will base their writing from one strong, central image, as I often find myself doing in my own poetry.

I also like poems that are obviously trying to do something with language. Language is our own construction, so what happens when poets push it? Can their writing handle it, or does it just fall short?

I also have a couple of danger words and images that invoke little alarms to go off. Some examples: mirrors (or reflection), roses, your soul, blind love, burning love, tears like rain, shadows, sands of time, tree of life, and other clichés that we’re all just tired of hearing. For me, if any of these are in your poems, there better be a hell of a good reason for it. Now hear me out, some poets can use these images and create a great, unique poem. But most cannot.

I want to read a line, a poem, or an image that makes me jealous that I did not think of it myself.

I know that I have my own biases in poetry, everybody does, but it’s the best when we find those that we like personally and those that we know our readers are going to love too. That’s one of the best things about being a part of a literary magazine. 

Meet Your Editor

28 Feb

Name:  Jeff Haynes

Position: Editor-in-Chief

Genre: I’m a poet, dawg.

Turn-ons (Literary): I like poems that are verbose and in-your-face.  I like poems that push boundaries.  I like poems that aren’t scared to defy our poetic expectations.  I like poems that never wave a white flag of surrender—poems that aren’t afraid to fail. Contemporary, contemporary, contemporary is my mantra.

Turn-offs (Literary):  I hate poems that are timid and conforming, and that refuse to take chances.  Safety is for the birds. Also, don’t give me poems that try to tell me the meaning of life. Like, really dude, a murder of crows changed your life…nah, I don’t trust that.

What I am reading now: Lately, in poetry, I’ve been a sucker for Hannah Gamble’s Your Invitation to a Modest Breakfast; Jennifer Knox’s Drunk by Noon; Tony Hoagland’s What Narcissism Means to Me; and Jason Bredle’s Carnival.  Heather Christle is really kicking my ass too.  For fiction, I’ve been on a Haruki Murakami binge. I’m working through 1Q84, while at the same time reading some classic Sherlock Holmes stuff.  The two play pretty nice together. 

My all-time favorite book: Alice Anderson’s Human Nature will always have a special place in my heart, as will Sandra Beasley’s I was the Jukebox.

My Favorite Literary Quote (right now): Celebrate Harder—from Hannah Gamble’s Your Invitation to a Modest Breakfast

Recently Read This and Loved it all the Way – Carrie Nelson

21 Feb

Image

George Ella Lyon is a celebrated southern writer whose work includes everything from children’s books to memoirs to plays.  She is, however, first and foremost, a poet which means her job is to “see and sing the connection between things.”  Her collection Catalpa won her the Appalachian Book of the Year Award, and last year she published She Let Herself Go, a wonderful new collection that includes odes to Virginia Woolf, a found poem in the form of an old family letter, and a narrative straight from the lips of Hera herself.  Recently read this and loved it all the way. 

What I Like to Read – Will Bebout

19 Feb

Hello, Everyone! My name is Will Bebout, and I am one of the Editors of The Minnesota Review. I must admit, I’m very new to the editorial gig, but I thought I’d let my mind wander a bit about the things I’ve read before and what I’ve liked about them.

 As a brand new editor, I’m learning a lot about the process. It turns out that there are a lot of submissions to the MR, which surprised me, because I thought we might have to solicit people, but being an established periodical means that submissions don’t seem to be a problem. The problem, then, is what to choose to feature. Having just started, I haven’t even gotten to that final phase yet, we (the fiction editorial team) are just taking our initial glance through the stories. We’ve seen some good entries and we’ve seen entries that have potential, but need some work. It’s a shame, because while I firmly believe that there are no bad stories, only stories told badly, we have to make up our mind with the first few pages whether to read on. If it doesn’t grab us in 3 or 4 pages, we can’t spend anymore time on it. Assuming a story has passed the first round, it graduates to round two to be looked at in detail, its merits debated amongst the team. At this point, the factor of space comes in, and we have to choose what will fit, but after these rounds of examination, the stories can finally become a part of The Minnesota Review! It’s a rigorous process, but it’s been effective so far.

 As for what will get a story to round two, I look for something that can be immersive. I want to start reading and not notice that I’ve read beyond 3 pages, to be so swept up in the story that I’ve forgotten I’m reading at all. Introductions are always tricky things, and there really isn’t a formula for how this is done, but I would say to make it clear what kind of story you are writing (horror, suspense, drama, day at the beach, etc…).

 Also, I need to care about the characters. Whoever you decide to write about, whoever is starring in your story, you need to do something to make me care about them, to get invested in their story and want to see it unfold. Is there a mystery that the story promises to reveal? Is there a conflict that I need to see resolved for this person? All great stories have an element of conflict, internal or external.

 To get my short story fix, I’ve recently been going to the podcasts Podcastle, a fantasy podcast, and Pseudopod, a horror podcast, both of which collect and air audio renditions of short stories. Part of the appeal is that I can listen to stories as I exercise or drive to work. I also like the wide variety of stories that come through, the ones that grab me right away or show me a sympathetic character I want to follow. If either of those genre appeal to you, I highly recommend checking those podcasts out.

 My fellow editors and I have a lot of stories to read through to put together our edition of The Minnesota Review, but I look forward to reading each and every one of them, and seeing what is out there. Thanks to everyone who submitted a story, and thanks to all the readers of our fine magazine. We hope you’ll be back again soon!

What Got Us Through Issue 81

10 Jan

When I was about 19, I started reading a hip independent rag out of New York by way of Decatur, Atlanta that covered the various appendages of throwback and contemporary hip-hop culture (more Crazy Legs and GZA than Gucci Mane and Louis Vuitton face tattoos). At the end of each issue, the editorial staff would catalogue a list of music joints that got them through a month of compiling the magazine, addressing harassing letters, writing comics about 40ozs of malt liquor, and responses to an obviously outstanding Chuck D advice column. I would often read this final section first as it satisfied various things for me: providing me a new hit list of underground jams for me to bang out to, as well as humanized the staff in such a manner that I trusted the material in the magazine – humorous or not, thuggish or not. Magazines and journals alike are comprised of a gang (see what I did there?) of people who have ranging and eclectic tastes in art, music, hipsterisms, supernatural teen romance novels, Nathan Freddy Blakes, books on creation myths, etc.

What I found in this short installment, including the plugs for mostly new albums, was that it humanized the magazine and gave shape to the staff that compiled the various pages, interviews, and reviews. The installment provided an intimacy to the rag that allowed its subscribers the man-behind-the-curtain opportunity to see who was behind the pages and why the staff should be important to the readers.

I find that this is likely the case with literary journals in that our submitters and blog readers often times don’t have the opportunity to engage with the editorial staff and get a voyeuristic view of who, or what (robot chickens?) we are and how our lives are comprised of various arts and experiences. The goal of this section (there will likely be more references to early 90s fringe music, graffiti, chupacabras, and hopefully a plug for anything Billy Bob Thornton pre-Bad Santa) is simply to familiarize our dynamic and evolving readership and contributors with who we are and what drives us during our writing and the Mad Max rush of reading submissions. Beyond this post, I will likely continue to pursue posts that are an attempt to give shape and color to the people in the room who are responsible for not getting coffee cup stains on packets of submissions, who dreary-eyed and loping spend a crippling, albeit passionate and energetic amount of time reading through and engaging in literary pugilism over your submissions. (We get knuckley and hide rolls of quarters in socks when things get bananas at the editorial table). Following is a list with some links, some lyrics, some justifications, some skullduggery, and some lists of rad music that we are vibing to when we read, write, and contemplate friendship-risking games of Monopoly. We hope you enjoy the tiny glimpse into the one of the mechanisms that makes is tic.

(Note: The next post will likely be something serious, like “What We Really Do in The Library” or “This One Time When I Was in a Bathroom at a Rest Stop Outside of Topeka…” We here at MR feel that it is important that we tackle most of the large issues in the literary-arts world. As an addendum to this post, I think that it’s important to add Franz Wright’s presumable playlist — when he isn’t being lulled to sleep by the cries of small children. Also, note that Franz Wright is not part of the minnesota review and that I like him very much as a human and a poet.)

Michelle Calkins

What I’m listening to right now…and what I’ve been listening to lately as I write is:

1. Brandi Carlile’s new album, Bear Creek
2. Florence + The Machine’s Lung’s: The B-Sides
3. Panda Bear’s song “Surfer’s Hymn” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrLqKc3dU5c

Tom Minogue

Playlist Bizness:

1. “The Past Is a Grotesque Animal” Of Montreal. Hissing Fauna, Are You the Destroyer?
2. “Check the Rhime” A Tribe Called Quest. The Low End Theory
3. “F.E.E.L.I.N.G.C.A.L.L.E.D.L.O.V.E” Pulp. Different Class
4. “Got My Mojo Working” Muddy Waters. [Single: Chess Records]
5. “Us v Them” LCD Soundsystem Sound of Silver

Franz Wright

1. Franz Wright
2. Franz Wright
3. Franz Wright
4. Franz Wright
5. Franz Wright

Jeff Haynes

Five Albums:

1. Screaming Females– Ugly
2. Silver Jews- American Water
3. Fiona Apple- The Idler Wheel…
4. Dr. Octagon- Dr. Octagonecologyst
5. Beastie Boys- Paul’s Boutique

Maria Elvira Vera Tata

1. Bebe: “Nostaré” and “Me fui”
2. Melendi: El violinista en el tejado”
3. Gipsy Kings: “Volare”
4. Ricardo Arjona: “Fuiste tú”
5. Carlos Baute: “Colgando en tus manos”

The Nathan Freddy Blake

1. Abner Jay: “Starving to Death on my Government Claim” <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dYiCaabaFQ>
2. Pixies: “Hey” <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIkWJZf33UY>
3. Dr. Octagon: “No Awareness” <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W__sSidbMHg>
4. CocoRosie: “Lyla” <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DkZDtUUcRCE>
5. Mulatu Astatqé: “Mètché Dershé” <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lS6aMm8x8Jg>

Arian Katsimbras

1. P.O.S.: “Fuck Your Stuff” (actually the whole album, but the anti-capitalist screed in this song just riles me right up for a romp through suburbia).
2. Big Boi feat. A$AP Rocky and Phantogram: “Lines” (also the whole album, ya’ know, because it’s Big Boi. A-Town down).
3. Miles Davis: “Blue in Green”
4. Nancy Sinatra: “You Only Live Twice”
5. Astronautalis: “This is Our Science”

Amy Marengo

Right now I’m on a throwback kick–a few older songs have made their way onto my current playlists:

1. “Way You Walk” by Papas Fritas
2. “10,000 Animal Calls” by Q and Not U
3. “The Seed” by The Roots
4. “Spilled Milk Factory” by Ugly Casanova
5. “Time Bomb” by Dismemberment Plan

I’m also enjoying:

“Ho Hey” by The Lumineers

Arian Katsimbras is patiently and quietly bouncing back from culture shock after moving from Reno, Nevada.

In Defense of Franz Wright (With Some Hyperbole and Mixed Metaphor)

21 Dec

The recent vitriolic responses to Franz Wright’s bombastic, albeit poignant Facebook post  (it’s hard to believe that we are even attempting serious discussion about a Facebook post) have been a point of trouble for me (here’s a link to the bathroom wall –http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/pageviews/2012/11/franz-wright-lets-fly-an-epic-facebook-rant-on-the-state-of-poetry). Many of the articles surmising his motives are only slight shades away from Franz’s initial lashing out, and it’s difficult to take any of the responses seriously. As far as I can rightly suss out, people are largely preoccupied with only a few things: that he’s bipolar or clinically depressed or whatever, that he’s a sour lion of a drunk, that he’s lurking outside people’s windows to steal their children and sell them to MFA programs under the table, or that he has daddy issues and takes them out on virtually everyone in the form of misogyny. Most of the blogs and articles as well as the heinous comments sections of those little beasties are laden with torchflame rhetoric to track down and dismember the monster responsible for making every little girl sob.

To be supa dupa clear, I absolutely do not agree with the platform that he staged his wobbling attack from, or the fact that an innocent bystander got clipped in the process, and I don’t agree with the assertion that he is a madman who shouts obscenities on the street corner during lunch hour; thing of it is, the culture of contemporary poetry needs the raving, straw in the hair loon to say the shit that no one else dare address. This is a man who fights with long claws as if he has nothing to lose, and this is the exactly the kind of writer we need to rouse our conversations and suspicions regarding the current state of contemporary poetry.

The egregious comparison David Biespiel makes between Wright and Rush Limbaugh (http://therumpus.net/2012/11/david-biespiels-poetry-wire-is-franz-wright-the-rush-limbaugh-of-american-poetry/) is outrageous and unmerited. The problem with this hackneyed comparison is that it disqualifies the urgency in the argument presented in his post (that the high literary art of contemporary poetry is threatened by market oversaturation and drooling juvenile goons spit out by swaths of MFA programs across the country) and attempts to qualify his messy younger years as reason enough to not take his argument seriously. The odious attack on his character (argumentum ad hominem, or in other words, “thrashing his character around like a bunch of wild dogs, rather than nodding to the actually fucking argument itself”) attempt to distract from his reasonable position that, simply, there are too many greed-head writers, not enough readers, and the greed-heads frankly do not have the talent nor ambition to actually master their craft and provide anything of value or substance.

This isn’t Wright being an asshole; this is Wright lighting a flare and shouting, “Here! Here is the fucking source of the problem! If you give a shit about this thing, then fix it. But first, acknowledge that there is actually a problem, children. And pour me a stiff drink. Deep brown, you dullard.” It is easy for the detractors to call out his character and put the cluttered thing on trial for its social misgivings, but it is only important to acknowledge that this is a man who cares deeply about the art and its legacy enough to risk being berated and ostracized and vilified. It’s simple to call him a browbeating meaniehead or a misogynist (there is absolutely zero evidence of misogyny in his post – only reference to a few coed writers who he feels have equally “sold their souls” to the great white devil of the academe) or a monster, especially when someone of his lineage and stature hiccoughs in the middle of a crowd with a gun in his hand.

Absolutely none of what has been said about this recent fracas actually addresses the argument that he has presented and it would seem that the concern for public redress is far more urgent for his critics than the address of a fattened system of well-funded poet babies who dilute the great art and its ever-failing legacy. Posterity may not be kind to Mr. Wright, but unless this issue is confronted headlong, posterity won’t be kind to 20th and 21st century poetics either. We’ll be reading Dr. Suessical musicals by our expensive lamplights and pine over the mistakes we have made in making monsters out of our poets. Give the man a platform (no more FB, Franz. Please) and a microphone and let him cuss the world from the highest building. What cowards are we to fold up and yelp at his snarl? Perhaps we should be climbing the fire escape to see the same view the great beast sees from upon high. Perhaps we will see ourselves mirrored as well as the world with some perspective. Perhaps it is we who are the monsters, and his gnarled-knuckle fist in our faces is exactly what we need. Give the man a platform. Give him his voice, for perhaps we need to hear our names called.

Arian Katsimbras is patiently and quietly bouncing back from culture shock after moving from Reno, Nevada.

“Please don’t judge my poem that stinks.”; or, Why the Overtly Self-Conscious Writer is Detrimental to Workshop

13 Dec

While talking with another writer recently, I admitted that I re-read my own poems often, not just to see if they need to be revised, but to admire them. She indulges in this self-admiration too, she admitted. And if I were to guess, I’d say most if not all writers do it. After all, the narcissistic writer (and especially, poet) is something parodied both outside the creative writing community as well as inside it. (See James Tate’s “Teaching the Ape to Write Poetry” for an example of the latter.)

And yet during poetry workshops, I’ve noticed that my fellow MFA-mates and I often attach disclaimers to poems we don’t feel “confident” in for one reason or another (often, for example, because we’re “trying something new”). Sometimes, the folks critiquing the poem agree that there is in fact good reason for us to lack confidence in these poems and then proceed to explain why harrowingly well; but other times these same folks devote precious workshop minutes to improving the concerned writer’s self-esteem, not poem.

But back to the self-doubting writer who makes his self-doubt known: Why the modesty? Shouldn’t such notoriously self-involved people (writers) be better at not caring about what other people think? Regardless of whether we should or shouldn’t be better at it, we’re not, in my estimation. It’s an interesting phenomenon (or maybe it’s actually something you could predict) that the most narcissistic-seeming people are often equally self-loathing and insecure, and those of us bringing work to workshop are, of course, not exceptions. And also it’s part of human nature to want to preempt someone else’s criticism, I think.

But regardless of whether or not the modesty of any such workshopped writer is understandable, as I’ve already mentioned, it fundamentally changes how the people critiquing a piece respond to it. Just as it’s human nature to tell people when we feel vulnerable, it’s also human nature to be more sensitive to the one who’s made his vulnerabilities known.

There are, of course, many factors that contribute to the constructive workshop of a weak piece. But in terms of setting the stage for it, the author—no matter how much he knows it to be true that his piece stinks—should not admit this weakness in the workshop. Instead, he should puff himself up like a bird in a fighting stance. It will be more fun for the other birds as they peck his work to pieces.

Michael Roche writes poetry in Virginia Tech’s MFA program. His work is forthcoming in Best New Poets: 2012.

A Latina’s Quick Thoughts: Culturally Diverse Writing Not Making the Cut

6 Dec

It is no secret that literary magazines’ contributors are often not representative of the diversity in our country, especially in terms of language, ethnicity, and gender. As a Latina writer, I’m submerged for the second time (the first being my arrival to the United States in Florida—a much more culturally diverse state than Virginia) in an environment that at times makes my skin feel alienated—not because of tone, rather because everything embodied by me has jarring results. This isn’t to say that this is a bad quality, but rather that it is different, intimidating, challenging, and yes, inspirational.

Canonical “white” texts (by “white” texts I mean those that are either framed within the white dominant paradigm—overwhelmingly residing in the white male perspective—or by an author that does not possess a diverse cultural background) have been imbedded in our classrooms and studies for centuries and this does not exclude Latinoamérica. Which is to say that we, as an occidental reading community, are familiar with those voices, their struggles and achievements; we have been trained and thus equipped with the tools to understand, analyze, and learn from such texts. Little of this is true for more diverse writings. And yet we live in a multimodal, multilingual world, shouldn’t our literature reflect multiplicity as well?

Things are changing; Latinos, like other culturally diverse writers, are gaining ground. In 2009, Jennine Capo Crucet was the first Latina to win the Iowa Short Fiction Award. Junot Díaz won the Pulitzer prize a couple of years ago, and was awarded a MacArthur genius grant, receiving $500,000. Recently, Eduardo Corral became the first Latino to be the winner of the Yale Series of Younger Poets. These are just some examples of climbing the ladder, many more can be found.

Diverse writing is getting more attention and recognition now, but that is not to say that we are nearly where we need and deserve to be. There should be accessible and widespread writing by US Latino/a (not translated works from Latin Americans, but works written by Latinos—those that identify with having Latin American descent/culture, and have experienced a, personal or generational, history of displacement, of Diaspora) about all sorts of topics ranging from Sci-Fi, to Mystery and more “Literary” works. What’s more: writing that isn’t just ethnic or culturally specific, like my former mentor pointed out, but great writing in all genres is desired.

We are not sharing an equal-opportunity playing field, that much has been demonstrated, but that does not give us the excuse to allow those in power (whether this be publishing houses, award committees, or simply professors, who might be resistant to change or to our otherness) to push us aside. We need to step it up: express our ideas in public and feel confident enough to put them in writing. And finally, summit more. How else would our reading community get acquainted with our thoughts and struggles?

We need to do this in order for readers to understand the difference, the duality (and at times multiplicity), from where we spur; the difference between being a Latin American and a Latino, the nature of being bilingual and bicultural. To expose ourselves so that we are understood and felt, so that our writing bears witness. But for people to cross the bridge, we must be able to build it first. In turn, those who may still be ignorant and unwilling, will be forced, again and again, to not toss us out for the sake of convenience, of established patterns, of incomprehension, but to look at us, and walk the extra mile to the other side of the bridge.

María Elvira Vera Tatá has finally embraced that she dwells in the Spanglish Realm and is, for better or worse, unable to find her way back to either standard Spanish or English.

 

Perfect Poem. Population: Zero

29 Nov

Too often it happens, I believe, as poets, we believe that there is a road-map that one can follow in the creation of the “perfect” poem.  Say, if we go up Linebreak 55 and get off on Enjambment 2, and go North on Stanza Boulevard, then we’ll find the almost microscopic village of Perfect Poem.  I’ll admit that I’ve loaded up my metaphorical pickup and set out Manifest Destiny Style in search of this Utopian city where all our words play nice with one another. I’ve flicked at least a thousand still-lit cigarettes out the driver side window and watched them glitter on the highway like a trail of breadcrumbs that I will, undoubtedly, have to follow back later. If I’m going to speak frank, and if honesty is the best policy, or so I have been told, it’s bullshit, really.

There’s no such thing as the “perfect” poem. No Utopian city of exact rhyme that sounds beautiful in every listener’s ear.  But still, as poets, we set out in our covered wagons for that great golden ghost town.  Why?  Well, why not?  Human beings, as a whole, are always chasing after some sort of unattainable perfection.  It is our nature, unfortunately.  But, if I am going to break away from metaphor—which, by now, I’m sure that’s what you’re hoping for—we need to understand that there is no such thing as the perfect poem, that all-pleasing lyric, or narrative, or L.A.N.G.U.A.G.E poem.  If you set out every time to write the perfect poem, you’re only going to end up disappointed.

That was me. And to some extent, still is me.  Each time I sit down at the computer (I cannot write with pen and paper, my handwriting, is, well, abysmal), I think “Ahh, Jeff, this is gonna be the one.” And you know what happens?  I walk away shaking my head, thinking, “Well, Jeffy-boy, you sure mucked that one up good.”  But I should not feel that way. And neither should you.  As an instructor once said in workshop, “I don’t know why we think we can write perfect poems—we don’t have perfect people.”  Very wise.

So I said, “Fuck it.”  I tossed the map to Perfect Poem in a blaze out my window. And it got easier—this whole poem writing thing.  Now, I don’t plan out my poems like some road-map to Graceland or wherever it is people find inner peace.  I just say, “I want to write about a cat today. Or Twinkies.” and I’m happier for it.  Sure, the poems aren’t perfect.  People may like some of them. People may hate some of them. That’s life.  I’ve made plenty of enemies. What’s a few more?  It’s writing for fun. For yourself.  Too often, I believe, we forget about that feeling. You know the one: happiness.

You’ve got to love your poems, flaws and all. They’re like your children. Sometimes you have a child that is everything you wanted—and hey, that’s great. Sometimes though, you’re going to have the one that colors on the walls, and won’t eat their spinach—and hey, you know what, that’s okay too.

As so many people so much smarter than me have said, “If this becomes a job—then you should quit.”  I’ll add my own little blurb to that: “If you’re still on the road, still looking for perfect, pull over to the shoulder and appreciate the ugliness for a little while. It’s there for you, too.”

Jeff Haynes is a first year MFA student in Poetry. He is from Illinois, and loves The X-Files.

A Call for Submissions

23 Nov

Editors Joe Hiland and Michael Mlekoday recently distinguished work they would consider publishing in Indiana Review from work that just isn’t quite right for them. Rarely does an editorial staff pull back the green curtain and show us the Wizard’s working pieces, so to speak. In an effort to offer transparency to our submitters, my intention for this blog post is to be a little more honest about our reading tastes here at the minnesota review. Let it be known: We’re looking for some very specific submissions in our next reading period, to begin on January 1. Rather than warn you how to stay out of the rejection pile, I’ll do you one better and tell you exactly what it takes to get your work published in our magazine.

the minnesota review staff would like to see:

Ahistorical chupacabra fiction: To be fair, we saw quite a bit of this early in the current reading period. But these particular ahistorical chupacabra pieces were missing…something. That certain chupacabra duende. Which isn’t to say we weren’t thrilled with the quality of your submissions, because we were. Alice Munro sent us a piece that nearly made the final round of voting, but ultimately we editors sensed a severe lack of well-rounded chupacabras in the story with which the audience could sympathize. As my grandfather always told me and his grandfather told him, One complex chupacabra is simply not enough in sustaining emotional resonance throughout the entirety of a narrative arc. Think of the minnesota review as a chupacabra-friendly market from now on. Amaze us with your chupacabravado. We’re also on call 24/7 to answer any chupacabra or chupacabra-related inquiries from our Twitter and Facebook accounts, so please do avail yourself of our collective expertise.

Direct address from the narrator to the reader: Is there a reason so few of you make space in your submissions to give an explicit shout-out to the editors and genre readers of the minnesota review, specifically me, Nathan Blake, saying something flattering about my choice secondary sexual characteristics?

Take for example the following excerpt from a recent submission that found success elsewhere (it was scooped up by Esquire)–

Mona parked her Honda beside the bridge abutment overlooking the Potomac River, roiling with crests like grabbing hands in the storm’s current. She unwrinkled a tattered and washed-out Polaroid from her hip pocket, a ritual she had practiced already fifteen or twenty times before even stopping to eat. The photograph seemed to hum with fluorescent light between her fingertips. Here was a man flexing his corded arms as he brought an axe to, and presumably–in a single fluid arc, no doubt–through, a felled tree. Nathan Blake, fiction reader, she whispered softly at the photograph, stroking gently with her upper lip the man’s formidable, not-weird sideburns. Mona’s life’s love, this Nathan Blake, fiction reader. Mona’s answered prayer.

Come correct, dear submitters. Show me some love. While I technically can’t guarantee you publication for your endeavors, I can guarantee you some serious consideration for BFF Status, for which there is only a handful of people in the queue (I’m looking at you, Ashton Kutcher & Charles Barkley…).

Submissions that are just Instagrams of thesaurus pages: We think this could work, depending on the thesaurus.

Two or more characters with the same name in the same story: Have you ever noticed there are really only like fifteen names? I have. At Friendly’s every night I meet probably five different people named Emily or John. And don’t you think these eponymic coincidences would occur more often in contemporary fiction, if much contemporary fiction indeed serves a mimetic function? That’s why I’ve decided to name both main characters in my forthcoming novel “Hambone.”

Here’s an excerpt from Hambone & Hambone, which drives at the heart of what we’re looking for in fiction submissions–

“Hambone, bring that old box of photographs in here for me to look at,” called Hambone to Hambone, who was deboning a ham in the kitchen before Wednesday supper. “I’d like to see that one of Nathan Blake, fiction reader, again. He’s got some serious skills in terms of looking great and smelling like, absolutely masculine. If someone thinks he smells bad, like hot garbage, perhaps, on the downtown bus, and lets him know that that’s what he smells like, hot garbage on the downtown bus, loud enough for the whole bus to hear and smirk at him for, then that person is probably jealous of Nathan Blake, fiction reader, of his formidable/not-weird sideburns, and maybe that person even has a defective freaking nose, maybe that nose smells the opposite of things as they are in reality, has that explanation even crossed your brainwave?”

“I know what you mean. I keep his portrait on my bedside,” said Hambone, “for it is the stuff dreams are shaped of.”

“I agree, Hambone,” said Hambone. “The most pleasant dreams.”

“I also agree, Hambone,” Hambone agreed.

Are you taking notes? I have seen the future of letters in this world, and it is Hambone & Hambone, forthcoming in a Highlights Magazine exclusive serialization.

Poems featuring roses: Duh, roses are very, very poetic. That is Heartstuff 101. Help yourself out by including one (or, to err on the side of caution, twelve) to raise the emotional stakes in your poem. We at the minnesota review like our poetry like we like our coffee–botanical in scope, ripe with tears.

 Nathan Blake was chosen as Time’s Person of the Year in 2006.

Dealing with Writer’s Block

15 Nov

Widespread advice to overcome writer’s block is to read. Read a lot. But no one seems to talk about the type of words which will turn out helpful— and because it is such a hard thing to decipher, I invite you to delve into this with me. My findings revolve around words, unfixed on their ultimate shape:

The Book that Inspired You Once Upon a Time: For me, it was Harry Potter. Being an immigrant is hard enough without having to deal with adolescence as a “bonus”. Many of us encounter a moment in our lives which forces us to escape to a better, safer, magical place—Hogwarts was it for me. Read something that makes you believe. So radically, so beautifully, that it will drag you right back to a creative force.

The Book that Rattled Your Soul: Junot Díaz’s The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao. Wao is right, our wow! in Spanish. A fearless record of the emotional hardship you have endured, with a weaving thread of hope. Find, again, that connection of words and reality, your reality, spoken by another but felt by so many of us. After all, what’s the point of writing if it isn’t to bond our readers?

Why Stick to Just the Written Word? How about that film that made you cry and want to pick yourself up and do more, do better, to try once more: The Pursuit of Happiness, Habana Blues, and (for some odd reason) Biutiful did it for me. Not just the inspirational, but films that exhibit the raw honesty of the human heart. A stellar weaving of images, silences, and words, because, isn’t that just what our stories often aim to do?

Talk to Your Craft Mentor: Voicing what you want but cannot do can serve as that so-very-needed, clearing-your-throat step. My person is Cecilia Rodríguez Milanés, a beautiful and passionate Latina writer, who also happens to care. Someone motherly that is not afraid to give you some real tough love. Knock on the door to facilitate advice, or the unlikely dreaded scold.

Tune in: Music was probably the first thing you moved yourself to. I did–to drums in my mother’s womb. It’s innate even. If not sounds, vibrations. There is something visceral about it. No doubt it shapes us, moves us, motivates us. Let it flow through your veins; it promises not to disappoint. My choices go akin my mood. Bebe with her “Nostaré” and “Me fui” for those moments of pain, of betterment, of realization. But the most effective; that which you happen to come across, not exactly in your iPod mix, obscure even, but ground shaking. Yes, that one, the one that makes you, forces you, to write.

Go ahead. Have at it!

María Elvira Vera Tatá has finally embraced that she dwells in the Spanglish Realm and is, for better or worse, unable to find her way back to either standard Spanish or English.

 

Introducing Unexpected Objects: An Idea for Reviving or Finishing Difficult Poems

8 Nov

Lately, I’ve been dropping lures into my poems. Lures that would otherwise catch walleye in some small lake in northern Michigan are cropping up in my work to help me explore difficult subjects. The fact that lures are objects used to do something, that they are part of an action, made them particularly interesting and useful to me.

When introducing a lure into a poem that perhaps was so personal it lacked imagery, the physicality of the lure and the automatic disjunction between the lure and the subject forced me to make connections between images I would not have made otherwise. For example, I’m using a Rattle Tot (an erratic sort of lure that moves quickly from side to side in the water to attract fish) to explore a very inconsistent, frantic time in my childhood. One way I specifically connected the lure with my subject was through linking the movement of the Rattle Tot with the movement of a character’s eyes in the poem. Thus, the tangible aspects of the lure forced me to identify more tangible aspects of the situation/difficult subject.

The reason I give my example of introducing lures into my poems is that I think sometimes poets want to grapple with difficult (perhaps incredibly personal) subjects, but don’t know how to do so in a way that gives the subject a tangibility, a physical aspect that allows others to grasp aspects of the poem and not flounder in vague language.  Also, I think introducing foreign objects creates an energy that has the potential to drive new meanings into the poem, and may actually help the poet identify parts of a difficult subject that he or she did not previously see.

For me, at least, the absurdity of the object placed in a poem, especially if the object also has an active sort of function (as strange as that sounds, like a lure moving through water to catch fish) may allow the brain to find connections it had not noticed, and perhaps would not notice otherwise. I remember one of my high school teachers once advising my class to memorize a fact by picturing that fact either being read or announced or illustrated in a completely nonsensical situation. For example, I might imagine a goat telling me that the civil war began in 1861 while brushing his teeth in my garage. Whether this tactic is really so helpful, I’m not entirely sure. But, in my experience, the introduction of images, objects, or scenery that don’t obviously jive with a subject matter allows for an tension that allows for incredible creative potential.

Perhaps because we want to make sense of the absurd situation, the not immediately understandable connection between two seemingly different things, we generate bridges of meaning. For me, introducing an object that doesn’t seem to fit out-right into my poems, helps create connections that seem more fresh, and introduce new levels to the poem and the subject I’m dealing with.

So, I urge you to try dropping an object into a poem you’ve had trouble starting, finishing or revising. Perhaps the object will help pull your mind out of the depths of the subject for a moment to generate connections you had not seen. You may also get rid of the object after introducing it to the poem. The object may lead to some new insights/images/directions that lift the poem out of its stagnant space and allows for that energetic flirtation of a fin breaking water. Then, you can discard the lure, or keep it.

Michelle Calkins is from Grand Rapids, Michigan and is currently studying poetry at Virginia Tech.

Interview With Poet Jill McDonough

1 Nov

I just checked: at Amazon.com there are “Only 11 left in stock (more on the way).” of Jill McDonough’s new book Where You Live (Salt, 2012). You should probably put in your order soon, sign up on a waitlist, or something, because this selling-out-quick stuff seems to happen a lot when Jill releases new poems. For instance, this past summer her second collection of poetry Oh, James! (Seven Kitchens, 2012) sold out within a week or two of its original release. She’s a Pushcart Prize winner, a demanding poetry professor, a Witter Bynner and Stegner Fellowship recipient (among many others); you’ll find her work in publications like Slate, The Nation, and AGNI. Here’s an interview with Jill where she talks about empathy, bizarre pickup lines, and the power of ghazal.

Amy Marengo: During a Q&A a few years ago you said that empathy is one of the most important things you strive for when writing poetry. In your new book Where You Live we see empathy in many forms—from the meter maid in “Great Day at the Athenaeum” to women passing around a “cotton candy pink / angora sweater” in “Women’s Prison Every Week.” How do you empathize with the characters you write about without crossing a line and just feeling bad for them? If a poet sees that she has unintentionally victimized a person or people in one of her poems, do you have any advice on what she should keep in mind while editing?

Jill McDonough: First of all, sometimes a poem’s job is just to witness things.  For instance, I feel bad for Susanna Martin, who was hanged for witchcraft in 1692: in a poem I wrote about her I just documented the crazy things that counted as “just and sufficient proofs” against her.

But other times the poem’s job is to give the poet a vehicle for complicating her own initial feelings or response.  One thing I like about empathy is it helps make me bigger.  “[F]eeling bad for them” doesn’t usually do enough interesting work, for me; empathy means I’m going further, thinking about the specifics that make somebody’s life his or her own, admitting the ways I’m working on understanding what’s going on for anybody else.  And sometimes just completely falling short, too self-centered to be able to pull it off.

That meter maid, I felt bad that I misunderstood her–I wrote a poem, in part, to deal with the embarrassed kind of social horror that makes you wake up cringing, wishing you could take back the stupid thing you said.  It was a near miss–I could have been a pedantic asshole in that story, but instead I got to be a pedantic asshole who happened to make her laugh.

Those ladies passing around the sweater, I think that poem is less about them and more about me realizing how lucky I am, how blind and blithe I am about the things I take for granted, like clothes.  I guess I think the best way to deal with characters you feel bad for is to interrogate that feeling, to admit to your own blinders and try to see around them, to see things from other people’s perspectives.  To try to get big enough to do that.

AM: You recently got a full-time position teaching poetry at UMass-Boston—congratulations!  How is your writing/routine benefiting so far from not having to scramble to work as an adjunct?

JM: I still don’t get it, actually–I don’t yet have a routine, and I’m still getting my office set up.  I’m still understanding that it’s my office, and I don’t share it with anybody, and part of the job is that I can go there and write.  I’ve always had to be brutal with my time and my writing–to steal time or write while teaching comp or record ideas while driving to the prison, to always be multi-tasking.  And now I have not just more time but also less anxiety.  I’ve gotten grants, and been underemployed before, so I’ve had time like this, but it always came with a sense that I need to be hustling to figure out where the next money would come from, after the current money runs out.  So now I’m just kind of figuring out what it means to be safe.  So far it means a lot of reading.  And visiting with friends.  And exercise.  And sleeping through the night.  And appliances.  I have a washer, dryer, and dishwasher getting installed next week.  Because I am a fully employed American, goddammit.

AM: What’s the best conversation you’ve overheard lately and thought, “I NEED to write this into a poem”?

JM: The subway is always great for that.  A guy at Downtown Crossing told me and another woman–I think he was hitting on us–that if he saw us getting raped, saw us in our bra and panties, with a rapist on top of us, he would kill our rapist.  The other woman seemed impressed.  She thanked him.  And I just wanted to tell him, look, I feel like your heart is in the right place, but don’t lead with the bra and panties, you know?  I don’t know if I’m going to get that into a poem but I have for sure been thinking about it a lot.

AM: If you started a lit journal right now, what would you name it and who would you want in your inaugural issue?

JM: Wow!  I love this game.  My friends are really great writers–I’d want Tyehimba Jess and Michael McGriff and Matt Miller and Alexandra Teague and Kirsten Andersen and Andrea Cohen and Maggie Dietz and Todd Hearon and Liz Bradfield in there.  And my former students.  I’d get you and Danielle Jones-Pruett and Tara Skurtu in there.  So I guess I’d call it NEPOTISM.  I don’t know Rebecca Lindenberg but I’d want her in there, too–I keep teaching her poem “Catalog of Ephemera” and it keeps turning out awesome; students write amazing imitations of it, so good they are startled.  I’m taking it into a prison next month, for PEN New England.

AM: What’s the most important thing you teach young writers?

JM: I think it’s something about organizing your time.  I try to get students thinking about assignments for themselves, and mini-deadlines–write as much as you can in three minutes, that sort of thing.  Because the more you write the better you write, and having a direction and momentum in your writing can mean you get more good stuff done.  And everybody is tired and working a million jobs and looking for better work.  So finding the time to write, even when the whole point is that you want to be a writer, can be tricky.  Teaching them how to carve that time out of whatever circumstances they find themselves in is probably the most important thing I do.

AM: What’s the coolest moment of your poetry career?

JM: I am not really sure where the edges of my poetry career are, in the rest of my life.  But writing and publishing poems and teaching poetry has meant that I get to hang out with a lot of smart writers.  I like drinking with writers–there have been a lot of cool late-night moments in bars and hammocks and around kitchen tables.  When my first book was published I was teaching in China and skyped with Josey when she opened the box of books–that was cool, although I really wanted to be there and smell it.  When I had a fellowship at the New York Public Library they brought me rare books on a cart whenever I asked for them, and I had the run of the place.  I got Josey to go out with me because I wrote her a ghazal–that’s pretty good.  And when I got this awesome job the UMB students threw me a surprise party that made me cry.

For more info on Jill McDonough:

Amy Marengo is getting an MFA in poetry at Virginia Tech.

 

Five Horror Flicks for Halloween

25 Oct

It is October, and I’m thinking about Halloween. Call me morbid, but it’s my favorite time of the year. Like Christmas, Halloween has its own magic. As a kid in Southern Illinois, I lived for that one night where I could be somebody, anything other than myself.  But, of course, with growing older comes sacrifice. I got too old and too gangly to fit into my costumes. I didn’t want to be that guy still out collecting candy in high school. Still though, I wanted to capture that same spooky magic that comes along with the holiday.

As a teenager, I fell in love with horror films. Nightmare on Elm Street, Friday the 13th—I loved that stuff.  It’s a genre of film that too often gets lost in the shuffle. The easiest to discount and write off as trash.  I can understand that. The excessive violence. The out-of-this-world situations.  I resist this notion though. Even under the gallons of fake blood, there is still art in the genre.

There are horror films that are important—that have a message. So, in the interest of entertainment and art, I have compiled a top-five list of horror films that I think go beyond the blood-and-guts notion…that entertain, enlighten, and, of course, frighten.  Here goes:

5. John Carpenter’s The Thing (1982)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouZkkIsLiNg

For some, it might be easy to write off The Thing as a run-of-the-mill sci-fi/horror film. However, John Carpenter’s film, with close inspection, is less about an alien entity, but more about the paranoia present in the United States during the Reagan administration. Kurt Russell gives an outstanding performance in this claustrophobic masterpiece.

4. David Cronenberg’s Videodrome (1983)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fh5U2RW58p4

This film, starring the always creepy James Woods, is both visually stunning and thought-provoking.  In Videodrome, Cronenberg examines the merging of human and machine, sexuality, sadomasochism, television, and the impact of technology in the modern world.

3. Dario Argento’s Suspiria (1977)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8zbV_fFkYs

Speaking purely of plot, this is one of Argento’s weakest films.  However, what makes, for me, Suspiria so worthwhile is Argento’s brilliant vision for color and atmosphere. Everything is ultra-vivid. The colors are robust. The scenes dream-like (or nightmare-like). He has often been compared to Kubrick in his use of color. Suspiria proves that these claims are legit.

2. Guillermo Del Toro’s The Devil’s Backbone (2001)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHm_Me0CDC0

Not necessarily a “horror” film, but Del Toro’s 2001 meditation on the Spanish Civil War is haunting in its approach. This is a very hard film to pin down.  Like all good art though, it is evocative, dazzling in its ambition, and leaves you with the experience of being changed.

1. Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining (1980)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Cb3ik6zP2I

Stephen King may have hated the adaptation, but I loved it.  Kubrick takes King’s novel about the disintegration of the family unit, and moves it towards illustrating the effects of isolation, alcoholism, and history. While slow and plodding, this film is chilling. The overlook feels vast and foreboding.  The landscape is a wasteland. And Jack Nicholson, well, he’s Jack Nicholson.  The film that even horror-haters can agree on for its sheer horror.

Others that missed the cut:

Eyes Without a Face
Jacob’s Ladder
Rosemary’s Baby
Phantasm
Pet Sematary
Carnival of Souls

Jeff Haynes is a first year MFA student in Poetry. He is from Illinois, and loves The X-Files.

                                   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 34 other followers